From The Old Farmer's Almanac.
Obviously, this is not a new call and something that gardeners and bloggers have been espousing for many years. Yet we've never really considered the effect that may result should gardeners turn their backs on these species.
Considering that the average age of a gardener is 44 years old and the average lifespan is 72 years, it leaves us with only 28 more years of this generation who love flowering annuals and blooming roses. The upcoming Gen X'ers and Gen Y's aren't fussed with these darlings of our gardens and would prefer to plant succulents and foliage plants.
Should it give us pause that perhaps, roses may become extinct from our gardens within the next 30 years? And if so, will they become museum pieces in our botanical gardens destined to be visited only on special occasions?
More importantly, how will this affect the cut flower industry? It's possible that roses may become as unfashionable as whale blubber. This valued resource plummeted down the public opinion scales when we associated it with frolicking humpbacks. Future word association games may contrast "a dozen red roses" with "water-hungry, non-essential luxuries".
The downside to this quandary is the continued growth and exploration of new hybrids within the species. At present this is fueled by demand yet as that begins to taper off - and it will - it becomes less viable for growers to be as experimental.
Unless, of course, in their pursuit of hybridization they stumble across methods to make these plants less reliant on our most precious resource. Wouldn't that be a boon for gardeners - drought-tolerant roses?
If that can't be achieved, expect to see roses disappear from our neighbourhoods and the rose industry to decline. The rose garden could very well become a 'dinosaur' of the gardening world.